What is Article 383 of Indian Constitution – Defination & Meaning

Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
📅 Part XXI – Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions
🏷️Omitted

📚 UPSC Relevant

Article Number

383

part

Part XXI – Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions

Status

Omitted

Full Definition & Explanation

Article 383 of the Indian Constitution was initially intended to outline the functions and responsibilities of Governors in the provinces. It affected the governance structure at the provincial level, establishing the role of the Governor as a representative of the President. However, this article was omitted by the Seventh Amendment in 1956, which marked a major change in India’s federal structure. By removing this article, the Constitution aimed to streamline the powers and functions of governors, reflecting the evolving political landscape of the time. The omission of Article 383 had real-world implications for how states were managed and governed. Before its removal, governors had considerable influence over state matters, often leading to tensions between state governments and central authority. The change sought to reduce these tensions by limiting the central control over state affairs, thus promoting a more autonomous and democratic state governance. This was particularly key as India aimed to strengthen its federal structure, allowing states to exercise more power and responsibility. The removal of Article 383 is a prime example of how the Constitution adapts to the needs of society. The changing political dynamics and the push for greater state autonomy led to this amendment. Without the provision of Article 383, governors in India operate under different guidelines, focusing on coordination rather than control, which has helped enhance cooperative federalism. This shift has allowed states to evolve and address local issues more effectively, making governance more responsive to the needs of the people.

Historical Context

Article 383 resolved a critical practical problem: when India became a Republic on January 26, 1950, there were no freshly elected state legislative assemblies under the new Constitution. The existing provincial assembly members needed constitutional standing to continue functioning. Article 383 deemed them members of the new state assemblies. This continuity was maintained until the first general elections of 1951-52, which were conducted under universal adult franchise for the first time. After these elections, the transitional membership arrangements became obsolete. The Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act 1956 omitted Article 383 as part of the cleanup of transitional provisions that had served their purpose.

Key Features

– Article 383 defined the role of governors in provinces.
– It was part of the original Constitution adopted in 1950.
– The article was omitted by the Seventh Amendment in 1956.
– It aimed to centralize powers in the Governor’s office initially.
– Removal promoted greater autonomy for state governments

Importance & Impact

– The omission enhanced state autonomy and reduced central control
– Governors now serve a more coordinating role in governance
– It reflects India’s evolution towards cooperative federalism
– The change aimed to address tensions between states and the center.
– It encourages states to resolve local issues independently

Sample UPSC Question

Which of the following statements about Article 383 is correct? A) It defined the powers of the President. B) It was removed by the Eighth Amendment. C) It addressed the role of governors in provinces. D) It is still active in the Constitution. Choose the correct options.? Analyze these options carefully in light of the constitutional distribution of legislative and executive powers.

Answer

The correct answer is C. Article 383 addressed the role of governors in the provinces, defining their responsibilities. However, it was omitted in 1956, which changed the governance structure. Article 383 of the Indian Constitution was initially intended to outline the functions and responsibilities of Governors in the provinces.

Key Takeaways

✓ Article 383 defined governors’ roles in the provinces.
✓ It was omitted to enhance state autonomy
✓ The change aimed for cooperative federalism
✓ Governors now have limited and coordinated powers
✓ The amendment reflects evolving political dynamics

FAQs

Article 383 of the Indian Constitution was initially intended to outline the functions and responsibilities of Governors in the provinces. It affected the governance structure at the provincial level, establishing the role of the Governor as a representative of the President. However, this article was omitted by the Seventh Amendment in 1956, which marked a major change in India’s federal structure.

The change sought to reduce these tensions by limiting the central control over state affairs, thus promoting a more autonomous and democratic state governance. This was particularly key as India aimed to strengthen its federal structure, allowing states to exercise more power and responsibility. The removal of Article 383 is a prime example of how the Constitution adapts to the needs of society.

The changing political dynamics and the push for greater state autonomy led to this amendment. Without the provision of Article 383, governors in India operate under different guidelines, focusing on coordination rather than control, which has helped enhance cooperative federalism. This shift has allowed states to evolve and address local issues more effectively, making governance more responsive to the needs of the people.

Related Articles

Picture of Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of StudyHub. He holds a Master's degree and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Geology, alongside more than 7+ years spent building and verifying competitive exam content for Indian aspirants. He leads StudyHub's editorial process across Indian Polity, the Constitution, Indian Economy, History, Geography, Science, and the platform's other subject areas — checking every article against primary sources (bare act text and Gazette notifications for constitutional topics, government and Economic Survey data for economy content, standard reference material elsewhere) and flagging it for re-verification whenever a relevant amendment, policy, or data update makes an earlier version outdated.
Scroll to Top