What is Article 92 of Indian Constitution – Defination & Meaning

Article 92: The Chairman or the Deputy Chairman not to preside while a resolution for his removal from office is under consideration (1) At any sitting of the
📅 Part V – The Union
🏷️Active

📚 UPSC Relevant

Article Number

92

part

Part V – The Union

Status

Active

Bare Acts Text

Article 92: The Chairman or the Deputy Chairman not to preside while a resolution for his removal from office is under consideration

  • (1) At any sitting of the Council of States, while any resolution for the removal of the Vice-President from his office is under consideration, the Chairman, or while any resolution for the removal of the Deputy Chairman from his office is under consideration, the Deputy Chairman, shall not, though he is present, preside, and the provisions of clause (2) of article 91 shall apply in relation to every such sitting as they apply in relation to a sitting from which the Chairman, or, as the case may be, the Deputy Chairman, is absent.
  • (2) The Chairman shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the Council of States while any resolution for the removal of the Vice-President from his office is under consideration in the Council, but, notwithstanding anything in article 100, shall not be entitled to vote at all on such resolution or on any other matter during such proceedings.
READ ALSO  What is Article 95 of Indian Constitution - Defination & Meaning

Full Definition & Explanation

Article 92 of the Indian Constitution addresses a specific situation during the proceedings of the Council of States, which is also known as the Rajya Sabha. This article states that if there is a resolution to remove the Vice-President or the Deputy Chairman from office, that person cannot preside over the session while the resolution is being discussed. This rule is key because it ensures fairness in the removal process, preventing any potential bias from the person whose removal is being debated. For example, if the Deputy Chairman is facing a motion for removal, their presence and ability to preside could influence the proceedings, thus compromising the integrity of the process. Additionally, while the Chairman or Deputy Chairman cannot preside over the meeting, they still retain the right to participate in discussions and debates. However, they cannot vote on the matter of their own removal. This provision emphasizes the importance of impartiality during discussions about their office, allowing for open and fair dialogue among the members of the Council. The ability to speak allows the Chairman or Deputy Chairman to defend themselves, but the prohibition against voting ensures that they do not influence the outcome directly. The implications of Article 92 extend to promoting accountability within the legislative process. It reinforces the idea that no one should be in a position to control or manipulate discussions regarding their own authority. By maintaining this level of separation, it helps uphold democratic principles and protect the integrity of the parliamentary system. In practical terms, this article ensures that the members of the Council can deliberate freely and fairly, without fear of bias or manipulation from the chairperson in question.

Historical Context

Article 92 was included in the Constitution when it was adopted in 1950. During the Constituent Assembly debates, there was a strong emphasis on the need for a fair legislative process, especially concerning the removal of high officials. The framers recognized that allowing the Chairman or Deputy Chairman to preside over their own removal could lead to conflicts of interest. This awareness has led to its unchanged status in subsequent amendments, reinforcing its importance. The Supreme Court has also upheld this article in several cases, affirming the need for impartiality in parliamentary proceedings.

Key Features

– The Chairman or Deputy Chairman cannot preside during their removal discussions.
– They can participate in debates but cannot vote on removal resolutions.
– This article specifically applies to the Council of States.
– It ensures fairness in the removal process of high officials.
– The provision promotes accountability within the legislative system.

Importance & Impact

– This article prevents any potential bias during discussions about an official’s removal.
– The Chairman or Deputy Chairman can still defend themselves during debates.
– The prohibition of voting ensures fairness for all Council members involved.
– It helps maintain democratic values and principles within parliamentary processes.
– The article encourages transparency and fairness in all legislative actions.

Sample UPSC Question

Consider the following statements about Article 92: 1. The Chairman of Rajya Sabha cannot preside when a removal resolution against them is being considered. 2. The Chairman is not allowed to be present in the House during removal resolution proceedings. 3. The Deputy Chairman presides when a removal resolution against the Chairman is being considered. 4. Article 92 reflects the principle that no one should be a judge in their own case. Which statements are correct? a) 1 and 3 only b) 1, 3 and 4 only c) 2 and 4 only d) 1, 2 and 3 only

Answer

Answer: b) 1, 3 and 4 only Statement 1 is correct — Article 92 bars the Chairman from presiding during such proceedings. Statement 2 is wrong — the Chairman can be present and even speak in the House; they are only barred from presiding. Statement 3 is correct — the Deputy Chairman steps in. Statement 4 is correct — this embodies the natural justice principle of nemo judex in causa sua.

Key Takeaways

✓ The Chairman cannot preside over their own removal discussions.
✓ Participation in debates is allowed, but voting is prohibited.
✓ This article specifically applies to proceedings in the Council of States.
✓ It promotes fairness and accountability in the legislative process as a whole.
✓ The provisions of Article 92 ensure the integrity of democratic practices.

FAQs

Article 92 of the Indian Constitution addresses a specific situation during the proceedings of the Council of States, which is also known as the Rajya Sabha. This article states that if there is a resolution to remove the Vice-President or the Deputy Chairman from office, that person cannot preside over the session while the resolution is being discussed. This rule is key because it ensures fairness in the removal process, preventing any potential bias from the person whose.

This provision emphasizes the importance of impartiality during discussions about their office, allowing for open and fair dialogue among the members of the Council. The ability to speak allows the Chairman or Deputy Chairman to defend themselves, but the prohibition against voting ensures that they do not influence the outcome directly. The implications of Article 92 extend to promoting accountability within the legislative process.

Article 92 plays a key role in maintaining fairness during the removal of high officials. It prevents the abuse of power by ensuring that the Chairman or Deputy Chairman does not influence the proceedings regarding their own removal. This contributes to the overall integrity and transparency of the parliamentary system.

Related Articles

Picture of Editor-in-Chief Pramod

Editor-in-Chief Pramod

Pramod is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of StudyHub. He holds a Master's degree and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Geology, alongside more than 7+ years spent building and verifying competitive exam content for Indian aspirants. He leads StudyHub's editorial process across Indian Polity, the Constitution, Indian Economy, History, Geography, Science, and the platform's other subject areas — checking every article against primary sources (bare act text and Gazette notifications for constitutional topics, government and Economic Survey data for economy content, standard reference material elsewhere) and flagging it for re-verification whenever a relevant amendment, policy, or data update makes an earlier version outdated.
Scroll to Top