What is Article 107 of Indian Constitution – Defination & Meaning

Article 107: Provisions as to introduction and passing of Bills (1) Subject to the provisions of articles 109 and 117 with respect to Money Bills and other
📅 Part V – The Union
🏷️Active

📚 UPSC Relevant

Article Number

107

part

Part V – The Union

Status

Active

Bare Acts Text

Article 107: Provisions as to introduction and passing of Bills

  • (1) Subject to the provisions of articles 109 and 117 with respect to Money Bills and other financial Bills, a Bill may originate in either House of Parliament.
  • (2) Subject to the provisions of articles 108 and 109, a Bill shall not be deemed to have been passed by the Houses of Parliament unless it has been agreed to by both Houses, either without amendment or with such amendments only as are agreed to by both Houses.
  • (3) A Bill pending in Parliament shall not lapse by reason of the prorogation of the Houses.
  • (4) A Bill pending in the Council of States which has not been passed by the House of the People shall not lapse on a dissolution of the House of the People.
  • (5) A Bill which is pending in the House of the People, or which having been passed by the House of the People is pending in the Council of States, shall, subject to the provisions of article 108, lapse on a dissolution of the House of the People.

READ ALSO  What is Article 235 of Indian Constitution - Defination & Meaning

Full Definition & Explanation

Article 107 of the Indian Constitution lays down the procedures for introducing and passing bills in Parliament. It states that a bill can begin in either the Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). This flexibility allows for diverse legislative proposals to be presented, reflecting the democratic spirit of the country. However, bills concerning money matters must adhere to specific rules outlined in Articles 109 and 117, which limit their introduction to the Lok Sabha. This ensures that the financial integrity of the nation remains protected. The passage of a bill is only confirmed when both Houses of Parliament agree to it. This agreement can occur either without any amendments or with amendments that both Houses accept. This provision encourages negotiation and compromise between the Houses, fostering a collaborative legislative process. It also prevents one House from unilaterally passing a bill, ensuring that both Houses play an active role in shaping laws. Also, if a bill is pending in Parliament, it does not lapse due to prorogation, allowing for continued discussion and deliberation. There are exceptions regarding bills pending during elections or the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. For instance, if a bill is pending in the Rajya Sabha but has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, it does not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. In contrast, if a bill is pending in the Lok Sabha, it will lapse upon dissolution. This distinction highlights the importance of the Lok Sabha in the legislative process, as it is directly elected by the people, reflecting their will in governance.

Historical Context

It states that a bill can begin in either the Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). This flexibility allows for diverse legislative proposals to be presented, reflecting the democratic spirit of the country. However, bills concerning money matters must adhere to specific rules outlined in Articles 109 and 117, which limit their introduction to the Lok Sabha. This ensures that the financial integrity of the nation remains protected. Article 107 of the Indian Constitution lays down the procedures for introducing and passing bills in Parliament. The passage of a bill is only confirmed when both Houses of Parliament agree to it.

Key Features

– A bill can originate in either House of Parliament.
– Money bills must follow specific rules outlined in Articles 109 and 117.
– A bill requires agreement from both Houses to be passed.
– Pending bills do not lapse due to prorogation of the Houses.
– Certain bills lapse upon the dissolution of the House of the People.

Importance & Impact

– This article promotes collaboration between the two Houses of Parliament.
– It ensures financial bills are handled carefully and responsibly
– Pending bills can continue after prorogation, allowing for ongoing discussions.
– It establishes a clear legislative process for all types of bills.
– The dissolution of the Lok Sabha affects bill status differently based on House.

Sample UPSC Question

Consider the following statements about Article 107: 1. A non-Money Bill may originate in either House of Parliament. 2. All bills pending in Parliament lapse when Lok Sabha is dissolved. 3. Bills pending before Rajya Sabha alone do not lapse on dissolution of Lok Sabha. 4. A bill passed by both Houses before dissolution can still receive presidential assent. Which statements are correct? a) 1 and 3 only b) 1, 3 and 4 only c) 2 and 4 only d) 1, 2 and 4 only

Answer

Answer: b) 1, 3 and 4 only Statement 1 is correct — non-Money Bills can start in either House. Statement 2 is wrong — not all bills lapse; bills pending only in Rajya Sabha do not lapse. Statement 3 is correct per Article 107. Statement 4 is correct — bills passed by both Houses before dissolution remain valid and can receive assent.

Key Takeaways

✓ Bills can start in either House of Parliament.
✓ Both Houses must agree for a bill to pass.
✓ Pending bills survive prorogation, allowing continued discussion
✓ Dissolution affects pending bills differently between Houses
✓ Money bills follow specific introduction rules in the Lok Sabha.

FAQs

Article 107 of the Indian Constitution lays down the procedures for introducing and passing bills in Parliament. It states that a bill can begin in either the Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). This flexibility allows for diverse legislative proposals to be presented, reflecting the democratic spirit of the country.

This provision encourages negotiation and compromise between the Houses, fostering a collaborative legislative process. It also prevents one House from unilaterally passing a bill, ensuring that both Houses play an active role in shaping laws. Also, if a bill is pending in Parliament, it does not lapse due to prorogation, allowing for continued discussion and deliberation.

For instance, if a bill is pending in the Rajya Sabha but has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, it does not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. In contrast, if a bill is pending in the Lok Sabha, it will lapse upon dissolution. This distinction highlights the importance of the Lok Sabha in the legislative process, as it is directly elected by the people, reflecting their will in governance.

Related Articles

Picture of Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of StudyHub. He holds a Master's degree and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Geology, alongside more than 7+ years spent building and verifying competitive exam content for Indian aspirants. He leads StudyHub's editorial process across Indian Polity, the Constitution, Indian Economy, History, Geography, Science, and the platform's other subject areas — checking every article against primary sources (bare act text and Gazette notifications for constitutional topics, government and Economic Survey data for economy content, standard reference material elsewhere) and flagging it for re-verification whenever a relevant amendment, policy, or data update makes an earlier version outdated.
Scroll to Top