What is Article 185 of Indian Constitution – Defination & Meaning

Article 185: The Chairman or the Deputy Chairman not to preside while a resolution for his removal from office is under consideration (1) At any sitting of
📅 Part VI – The States
🏷️Active

📚 UPSC Relevant

Article Number

185

part

Part VI – The States

Status

Active

Bare Acts Text

Article 185: The Chairman or the Deputy Chairman not to preside while a resolution for his removal from office is under consideration

  • (1) At any sitting of the Legislative Council, while any resolution for the removal of the Chairman from his office is under consideration, the Chairman, or while any resolution for the removal of the Deputy Chairman from his office is under consideration, the Deputy Chairman, shall not, though he is present, preside, and the provisions of clause (2) of article 184 shall apply in relation to every such sitting as they apply in relation to a sitting from which the Chairman or, as the case may be, the Deputy Chairman is absent.
  • (2) The Chairman shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the Legislative Council while any resolution for his removal from office is under consideration in the Council and shall, notwithstanding anything in article 189, be entitled to vote only in the first instance on such resolution or on any other matter during such proceedings but not in the case of an equality of votes.
READ ALSO  What is Article 290 of Indian Constitution - Defination & Meaning

Full Definition & Explanation

Article 185 of the Indian Constitution focuses on the conduct of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council during their potential removal process. When a resolution is proposed to remove either the Chairman or the Deputy Chairman, the individual involved cannot preside over the sitting where this resolution is discussed. This is to ensure fairness and impartiality in the proceedings, preventing any influence over the decision-making process regarding their own removal. For example, if the Deputy Chairman is facing removal, he cannot lead the discussion or sway the other members, ensuring that the process remains unbiased. However, the article also grants the Chairman or Deputy Chairman the right to participate in the discussion. They can speak and present their case, which is critical for a fair hearing. Importantly, while they can vote on the resolution initially, they lose this right in the event of a tie. This ensures that they cannot cast a deciding vote when their position is in question, which would not be in the spirit of fair governance. The article thus balances the need for a fair removal process with the rights of the officials involved, allowing them a chance to defend themselves. The practical impact of Article 185 can be seen in various legislative scenarios where leadership is challenged. It promotes accountability among the Chairpersons in the Legislative Council. By ensuring that they cannot preside over their own removal debates, it instills confidence in the legislative process, showing that no one is above accountability. This article is part of a broader framework that encourages responsible governance and active participation of elected representatives in a transparent manner.

Historical Context

When a resolution is proposed to remove either the Chairman or the Deputy Chairman, the individual involved cannot preside over the sitting where this resolution is discussed. This is to ensure fairness and impartiality in the proceedings, preventing any influence over the decision-making process regarding their own removal. For example, if the Deputy Chairman is facing removal, he cannot lead the discussion or sway the other members, ensuring that the process remains unbiased. However, the article also grants the Chairman or Deputy Chairman the right to participate in the discussion.

Key Features

– The Chairman cannot preside over resolutions for their own removal.
– The Deputy Chairman similarly cannot lead during their removal discussions.
– Both officials can participate in the deliberations regarding their removal.
– They can vote initially on the resolution but not in case of a tie.
– These provisions ensure impartiality and fairness in legislative proceedings.

Importance & Impact

– Promotes accountability among leaders in the Legislative Council
– Ensures fair procedures during the removal of Council officials
– Protects the integrity of the legislative process from bias
– Encourages transparent governance within state legislative bodies
– Allows officials to defend themselves while maintaining procedural fairness

Sample UPSC Question

Consider the following statements regarding Article 185 of the Indian Constitution: 1. The Chairman can preside over a resolution for their removal. 2. The Deputy Chairman has the right to speak during their removal process. Which of the above statements is/are correct? Consider that: Article 185 of the Indian Constitution focuses on the conduct of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council during their potential removal process in the context of Article 185. A) Only 1 B) Only 2 C) Both 1 and 2 D) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer

The correct answer is B) Only 2. The Chairman cannot preside over their own removal resolution, ensuring fairness. However, the Deputy Chairman can participate in discussions during their removal process. Article 185 of the Indian Constitution focuses on the conduct of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council during their potential removal process.

Key Takeaways

✓ Article 185 ensures fairness during removal discussions
✓ Chairman cannot preside over their own removal process.
✓ Deputy Chairman can participate but not preside during removal.
✓ Voting rights are limited during removal debates
✓ Promotes integrity and accountability in legislative governance

FAQs

Article 185 of the Indian Constitution focuses on the conduct of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council during their potential removal process. When a resolution is proposed to remove either the Chairman or the Deputy Chairman, the individual involved cannot preside over the sitting where this resolution is discussed. This is to ensure fairness and impartiality in the proceedings, preventing any influence over the decision-making process regarding their own removal.

Importantly, while they can vote on the resolution initially, they lose this right in the event of a tie. This ensures that they cannot cast a deciding vote when their position is in question, which would not be in the spirit of fair governance. The article thus balances the need for a fair removal process with the rights of the officials involved, allowing them a chance to defend themselves.

It promotes accountability among the Chairpersons in the Legislative Council. By ensuring that they cannot preside over their own removal debates, it instills confidence in the legislative process, showing that no one is above accountability. This article is part of a broader framework that encourages responsible governance and active participation of elected representatives in a transparent manner.

Related Articles

Picture of Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of StudyHub. He holds a Master's degree and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Geology, alongside more than 7+ years spent building and verifying competitive exam content for Indian aspirants. He leads StudyHub's editorial process across Indian Polity, the Constitution, Indian Economy, History, Geography, Science, and the platform's other subject areas — checking every article against primary sources (bare act text and Gazette notifications for constitutional topics, government and Economic Survey data for economy content, standard reference material elsewhere) and flagging it for re-verification whenever a relevant amendment, policy, or data update makes an earlier version outdated.
Scroll to Top