What is Article 217 of Indian Constitution – Defination & Meaning

Article 217: Appointment and conditions of the office of a Judge of a High Court (1) Every Judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President by
📅 Part VI – The States
🏷️Active

📚 UPSC Relevant

Article Number

217

part

Part VI – The States

Status

Active

Bare Acts Text

Article 217: Appointment and conditions of the office of a Judge of a High Court

  • (1) Every Judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal, and shall hold office, in
    the case of an additional or acting Judge, as provided in article 224, and in any other case, until he attains
    the age of sixty-two years:
  • Provided that—
    • (a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
    • (b) a Judge may be removed from his office by the President in the manner provided in clause (4) of article 124 for the removal of a Judge of the Supreme Court;
    • (c) the office of a Judge shall be vacated by his being appointed by the President to be a Judge of the Supreme Court or by his being transferred by the President to any other High Court within the territory of India.
  • (2) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of a High Court unless he is a citizen of India and—
    • (a) has for at least ten years held a judicial office in the territory of India; or
    • (b) has for at least ten years been an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession;
  • Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause—
    • (a) in computing the period during which a person has held judicial office in the territory of India, there shall be included any period, after he has held any judicial office, during which the person has been an advocate of a High Court or has held the office of a member of a tribunal or any post, under the Union or a State, requiring special knowledge of law;
    • (aa) in computing the period during which a person has been an advocate of a High Court, there shall be included any period during which the person has held judicial office or the office of a member of a tribunal or any post, under the Union or a State, requiring special knowledge of law after he became an advocate;
    • (b) in computing the period during which a person has held judicial office in the territory of India or been an advocate of a High Court, there shall be included any period before the commencement of this Constitution during which he has held judicial office in any area which was comprised before the fifteenth day of August, 1947, within India as defined by the Government of India Act, 1935, or has been an advocate of any High Court in any such area, as the case may be.
  • (3) If any question arises as to the age of a Judge of a High Court, the question shall be decided by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the decision of the President shall be final.
READ ALSO  What is Article 31A of Indian Constitution - Defination & Meaning

Full Definition & Explanation

Article 217 of the Indian Constitution outlines the appointment process and conditions for High Court Judges. According to this article, every Judge is appointed by the President of India through a formal document called a warrant. Once appointed, a Judge typically serves until the age of sixty-two, unless they choose to resign or are removed from office. This ensures that the judiciary remains independent while also maintaining a level of accountability through the President’s appointment powers. The article specifies qualifications required for someone to become a High Court Judge. An individual must either have held a judicial position for at least ten years or have practiced as an advocate in a High Court for the same duration. This emphasizes the need for experience and competence in law before one can be entrusted with the major responsibilities of a Judge. Additionally, the article includes provisions for computing the required experience, which also considers any legal positions held before the Constitution came into effect. Also, in instances where there is a question regarding a Judge’s age, the President decides after consulting the Chief Justice of India. This ensures that there is clarity and finality about the qualifications of Judges. Article 217 thus plays a key role in preserving the integrity and efficiency of the judiciary, ensuring that only qualified individuals serve as Judges, thereby impacting the quality of justice delivered in High Courts across India.

Historical Context

According to this article, every Judge is appointed by the President of India through a formal document called a warrant. Once appointed, a Judge typically serves until the age of sixty-two, unless they choose to resign or are removed from office. This ensures that the judiciary remains independent while also maintaining a level of accountability through the President’s appointment powers. The article specifies qualifications required for someone to become a High Court Judge. Article 217 of the Indian Constitution outlines the appointment process and conditions for High Court Judges. An individual must either have held a judicial position for at least ten years or have practiced as an advocate in a High Court for the same duration.

Key Features

– Judges of High Courts are appointed by the President of India.
– A Judge must be a citizen and have ten years of legal experience.
– Judges serve until the age of sixty-two unless they resign or are removed.
– The President decides disputes regarding a Judge’s age in consultation with the Chief Justice.
– Judicial experience includes time spent as an advocate or in legal positions.

Importance & Impact

– Appointment by the President ensures a level of authority and accountability.
– Qualified judges lead to better administration of justice in courts.
– Experience requirements filter out unqualified candidates from the judiciary
– Judicial independence is key for a fair legal system
– Clarity on age helps maintain order within the judicial system.

Sample UPSC Question

Which of the following statements about Article 217 of the Indian Constitution is correct? A) Judges can serve beyond the age of sixty-two. B) The President appoints Judges based on recommendations from the Prime Minister. C) A person must have ten years of legal experience to be appointed. D) Judges are appointed by the Chief Justice of India. Select the correct option.

Answer

The correct answer is C. Article 217 states that a person must have at least ten years of experience in a judicial capacity or as an advocate to qualify for appointment as a High Court Judge, ensuring that only experienced individuals are selected for these key roles.

Key Takeaways

✓ High Court Judges are appointed by the President of India.
✓ Ten years of legal experience is required for appointment.
✓ Judges typically serve until they are sixty-two years old.
✓ The President resolves disputes regarding a Judge’s age.
✓ Judicial experience includes roles as advocates and in tribunals.

FAQs

Article 217 of the Indian Constitution outlines the appointment process and conditions for High Court Judges. According to this article, every Judge is appointed by the President of India through a formal document called a warrant. Once appointed, a Judge typically serves until the age of sixty-two, unless they choose to resign or are removed from office.

An individual must either have held a judicial position for at least ten years or have practiced as an advocate in a High Court for the same duration. This emphasizes the need for experience and competence in law before one can be entrusted with the major responsibilities of a Judge. Additionally, the article includes provisions for computing the required experience, which also considers any legal positions held before the Constitution came into effect.

Also, in instances where there is a question regarding a Judge’s age, the President decides after consulting the Chief Justice of India. This ensures that there is clarity and finality about the qualifications of Judges. Article 217 thus plays a key role in preserving the integrity and efficiency of the judiciary, ensuring that only qualified individuals serve as Judges, thereby impacting the quality of justice delivered in High Courts across India.

Related Articles

Picture of Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of StudyHub. He holds a Master's degree and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Geology, alongside more than 7+ years spent building and verifying competitive exam content for Indian aspirants. He leads StudyHub's editorial process across Indian Polity, the Constitution, Indian Economy, History, Geography, Science, and the platform's other subject areas — checking every article against primary sources (bare act text and Gazette notifications for constitutional topics, government and Economic Survey data for economy content, standard reference material elsewhere) and flagging it for re-verification whenever a relevant amendment, policy, or data update makes an earlier version outdated.
Scroll to Top