IPC Section 330 In English

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession, or to compel restoration of property.—

Section

330

Punishment

Imprisonment up to Seven Year(s) + Fine

Cognizable

Bailable

Non-bailable

Compoundable

Non-Compoundable (Refer to CrPC 320 for exceptions)

Trial Court

Court of Session

Bare Act Text

330. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession, or to compel restoration of property.— Whoever voluntarily causes hurt for the purpose of extorting from the sufferer or from any person interested in the sufferer, any confession or any information which may lead to the detection of an offence or misconduct, or for the purpose of constraining the sufferer or any person interested in the sufferer to restore or to cause the restoration of any property or valuable security or to satisfy any claim or demand, or to give information which may lead to the restoration of any property or valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.Illustrations(a)A, a police-officer, tortures Z in order to induce Z to confess that he committed a crime. A is guilty of an offence under this section.(b)A, a police-officer, tortures B to induce him to point out where certain stolen property is deposited. A is guilty of an offence under this section.(c)A, a revenue officer, tortures Z in order to compel him to pay certain arrears of revenue due from Z. A is guilty of an offence under this section.(d)A, a zamindar, tortures a raiyat in order to compel him to pay his rent. A is guilty of an offence under this section.

What is IPC Section 330 ?

According to the official bare act, this legal offense is defined as: 330. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession, or to compel restoration of property.— Whoever voluntarily causes hurt for the purpose of extorting from the sufferer or from any person interested in the sufferer, any confession or any information which may lead to the detection of an offence or misconduct, or for the purpose of constraining the sufferer or any person interested in the sufferer to restore or to cause the restoration of any property or valuable security or to satisfy any claim or demand, or to give information which may lead to the restoration of any property or valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.Illustrations(a)A, a police-officer, tortures Z in order to induce Z to confess that he committed a crime. A is guilty of an offence under this section.(b)A, a police-officer, tortures B to induce him to point out where certain stolen property is deposited. A is guilty of an offence under this section.(c)A, a revenue officer, tortures Z in order to compel him to pay certain arrears of revenue due from Z. A is guilty of an offence under this section.(d)A, a zamindar, tortures a raiyat in order to compel him to pay his rent. A is guilty of an offence under this section.

What is the punishment for Dhara 330 ?

The punishment for this specific offense is outlined under the law as: Imprisonment up to Seven Year(s) + Fine

Is IPC 330 bailable or non-bailable?

Under the Indian Penal Code, this specific offense is classified as a Non-bailable offense.

Is Dhara 330 a cognizable offense?

The legal status regarding police arrest without a warrant is that this offense isCognizable.

Which court has the jurisdiction to try IPC 330 cases?

Cases pertaining to this specific IPC section are triable by the Court of Session.

Can IPC Section 330 be compromised (Compoundable)?

The compoundable nature of this offense, meaning whether the parties can settle it out of court, is classified as: Non-Compoundable (Refer to CrPC 320 for exceptions).

Disclaimer:

This article is for general legal information only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific case.

Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of StudyHub. He holds a Master's degree and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Geology, alongside more than 7+ years spent building and verifying competitive exam content for Indian aspirants. He leads StudyHub's editorial process across Indian Polity, the Constitution, Indian Economy, History, Geography, Science, and the platform's other subject areas — checking every article against primary sources (bare act text and Gazette notifications for constitutional topics, government and Economic Survey data for economy content, standard reference material elsewhere) and flagging it for re-verification whenever a relevant amendment, policy, or data update makes an earlier version outdated.