What is Article 104 of Indian Constitution – Defination & Meaning

Article 104: Penalty for sitting and voting before making oath or affirmation under article 99 or when not qualified or when disqualified If a person sits or
📅 Part V – The Union
🏷️Active

📚 UPSC Relevant

Article Number

104

part

Part V – The Union

Status

Active

Bare Acts Text

Article 104: Penalty for sitting and voting before making oath or affirmation under article 99 or when not qualified or when disqualified

  • If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.
READ ALSO  What is Article 98 of Indian Constitution - Defination & Meaning

Full Definition & Explanation

Article 104 of the Indian Constitution outlines the penalties for members of Parliament who act without proper qualification. This article specifically addresses what happens when a member sits or votes in either House before taking an oath, or when they know they are disqualified or prohibited from doing so by law. Such actions can undermine the integrity of the legislative process, and this article aims to ensure that only qualified individuals participate in parliamentary proceedings. If a member violates this article, they face a penalty of five hundred rupees for each day they sit or vote while unqualified. This penalty can be recovered as a debt owed to the Union government. The article affects all members of Parliament, including both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. It serves as a deterrent against the misuse of power by ensuring that members are held accountable for their actions. However, it does not apply to individuals who are temporarily disqualified due to legal proceedings unless they have been officially declared disqualified by the law. This distinction helps protect the rights of members who may be under investigation but have not yet been found guilty. By enforcing such penalties, the article reinforces the principle that only those who meet the necessary qualifications can participate in the democratic process. In practical terms, Article 104 helps to maintain the credibility of the Parliament. It ensures that members adhere to the rules laid out in Article 99, which requires them to take an oath of office before participating in legislative activities. This requirement is foundational to the functioning of a responsible democracy, as it reinforces the idea that parliamentarians must act within the legal framework established by the Constitution. By imposing penalties for violations, the article promotes accountability and trust in the legislative process, ultimately…

Historical Context

Article 104 was included in the original Constitution adopted in 1950. It was designed to ensure that members of Parliament adhere to the constitutional requirements for membership and to maintain the integrity of the legislative process. Supreme Court cases, such as ‘Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala,’ have affirmed the importance of constitutional provisions in ensuring accountability among public representatives. Over the years, there have been discussions but no major amendments to this article, indicating its continued relevance in Indian polity.

Key Features

– Article 104 penalizes members for sitting or voting without taking an oath.
– A penalty of five hundred rupees is imposed for each day of violation.
– The article applies to members of both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
– It ensures that only qualified individuals participate in parliamentary activities.
– Violations can be recovered as a debt due to the Union government.

Importance & Impact

– It holds parliamentarians accountable for their qualifications and actions
– The penalty serves as a deterrent against unqualified participation
– This article reinforces trust in the legislative process among citizens.
– It ensures members follow the law before engaging in parliamentary duties.
– Strengthening democracy through accountability is its core objective

Sample UPSC Question

Consider the following statements regarding Article 104 of the Indian Constitution: A. It imposes penalties for voting without taking an oath. B. The penalty is applicable only to members of the Lok Sabha. C. A fine of five hundred rupees is imposed for each day of violation. D. It applies to members who are temporarily disqualified. Which of the above statements are correct? 1. A and B only 2. A and C only 3. A, C and D only 4. A, B, C and D

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer

Answer: b) 1, 2 and 4 only Statement 1 is correct — Rs 500 per day is the penalty. Statement 2 is correct — it is recoverable as a debt to the Union. Statement 3 is wrong — Article 104 applies to any House of Parliament, covering both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Statement 4 is correct — sitting without taking the oath is one ground for this penalty.

Key Takeaways

✓ Article 104 penalizes unqualified parliamentary participation
✓ Members must take an oath before voting
✓ Penalties are recoverable as debt to the Union.
✓ It ensures legislative integrity and accountability
✓ The article applies equally to both Houses of Parliament.

FAQs

Article 104 of the Indian Constitution outlines the penalties for members of Parliament who act without proper qualification. This article specifically addresses what happens when a member sits or votes in either House before taking an oath, or when they know they are disqualified or prohibited from doing so by law. Such actions can undermine the integrity of the legislative process, and this article aims to ensure that only qualified individuals participate in parliamentary proceedings.

However, it does not apply to individuals who are temporarily disqualified due to legal proceedings unless they have been officially declared disqualified by the law. This distinction helps protect the rights of members who may be under investigation but have not yet been found guilty. By enforcing such penalties, the article reinforces the principle that only those who meet the necessary qualifications can participate in the democratic process.

It ensures that members adhere to the rules laid out in Article 99, which requires them to take an oath of office before participating in legislative activities. This requirement is foundational to the functioning of a responsible democracy, as it reinforces the idea that parliamentarians must act within the legal framework established by the Constitution. By imposing penalties for violations, the article promotes accountability and trust in the legislative process, ultimately…

Related Articles

Picture of Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod Pal Founder and Editor-in-Chief

Pramod is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of StudyHub. He holds a Master's degree and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Geology, alongside more than 7+ years spent building and verifying competitive exam content for Indian aspirants. He leads StudyHub's editorial process across Indian Polity, the Constitution, Indian Economy, History, Geography, Science, and the platform's other subject areas — checking every article against primary sources (bare act text and Gazette notifications for constitutional topics, government and Economic Survey data for economy content, standard reference material elsewhere) and flagging it for re-verification whenever a relevant amendment, policy, or data update makes an earlier version outdated.
Scroll to Top