Indian Penal Code, 1860

Wrongful confinement of person for whose liberation writ has been issued.—

Section

345

Punishment

Imprisonment up to Two Year(s)

Cognizable

Non-cognizable

Bailable

Bailable

Compoundable

Non-Compoundable (Refer to CrPC 320 for exceptions)

Trial Court

Any Magistrate

Bare Act Text

345. Wrongful confinement of person for whose liberation writ has been issued.— Whoever keeps any person in wrongful confinement, knowing that a writ for the liberation of that person has been duly issued, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years in addition to any term of imprisonment to which he may be liable under any other section of this Chapter.
According to the official bare act, this legal offense is defined as: 345. Wrongful confinement of person for whose liberation writ has been issued.— Whoever keeps any person in wrongful confinement, knowing that a writ for the liberation of that person has been duly issued, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years in addition to any term of imprisonment to which he may be liable under any other section of this Chapter.
The punishment for this specific offense is outlined under the law as: Imprisonment up to Two Year(s)
Under the Indian Penal Code, this specific offense is classified as a Bailable offense.
The legal status regarding police arrest without a warrant is that this offense isNon-cognizable.
Cases pertaining to this specific IPC section are triable by the Any Magistrate.
The compoundable nature of this offense, meaning whether the parties can settle it out of court, is classified as: Non-Compoundable (Refer to CrPC 320 for exceptions).
Section (dhara) 345
Disclaimer:

This article is for general legal information only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific case.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top